Best AI model for product photos
Clean studio shots and lifestyle scenes of one product, ready for a shop listing or an ad.
Best for product photos
GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst
- 21%chance of ranking first
- GPT Image 2runner-up
Judge's most likely first pick; first on 4 of 10 requests.
Judge agreement 0.63
Tested requests, made with GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst
-
Macro product photo of a thin gold ring with a small emerald on a white marble block, shallow depth of field, soft shadow, luxury catalogue style
-
Premium product photo of matte black wireless earbuds in an open charging case on a dark brushed-metal surface, single soft key light, subtle reflections
-
A scented soy candle in an amber glass jar with a wooden lid, lit, on a stack of folded linen with eucalyptus sprigs, cosy warm ambience, soft focus background
-
white running shoe floating mid air, clean grey background, product photo for a shop listing
All 12 models, ranked
Strength is the Plackett–Luce rating fitted to the judge's rankings, centred at 0; the bar is the 95% bootstrap interval. Overlapping bars mean a tie.
| # | Model | Strength | Ranks first | Prompt match | Looks | Credits per imageCredits |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst |
|
21% | 37.6 | 5.58 | 2 |
| 2 | GPT Image 2 |
|
21% | 37.5 | 5.51 | 5 |
| 3 | Luma UNI-1 |
|
9% | 40.4 | 5.50 | 2 |
| 4 | Flux 2 Pro |
|
8% | 39.3 | 5.55 | 1 |
| 5 | Kling 3.0 Image |
|
8% | 38.2 | 5.59 | 1 |
| 6 | Nano Banana |
|
6% | 39.0 | 5.56 | 2 |
| 7 | Nano Banana Pro |
|
6% | 37.0 | 5.36 | 5 |
| 8 | Nano Banana 2 |
|
6% | 38.4 | 5.53 | 3 |
| 9 | Ideogram 4.5 |
|
5% | 38.7 | 5.56 | 3 |
| 10 | Seedream 5.0 Pro |
|
4% | 36.6 | 5.54 | 2 |
| 11 | Hunyuan V3 |
|
4% | 39.2 | 5.44 | 3 |
| 12 | Recraft V4.1 |
|
2% | 39.1 | 5.50 | 2 |
Narrow screens hide prompt match and looks, and show credits under each model name. Credits per image are Picsart's own estimate on the benchmark settings.
Best for
Computed from the benchmark data, not written by hand.
Wins the most requests
4 of 10 first picks for GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst; 7 models won at least one.
Follows the prompt most closely
40.4 mean CLIP similarity: Luma UNI-1, closest to the prompt.
Looks best to the aesthetic model
5.59 of 10 on the aesthetic predictor: Kling 3.0 Image.
Most consistent of the top four
±0.51 log-strength: Luma UNI-1 has the narrowest error bar of the top four.
How stable the judge was
0.63 Kendall tau between two shuffled judge runs (1 identical, 0 unrelated).
What the judge saw
We judge realism, correct product details and lighting that makes people want to buy. Best first; the judge saw them shuffled and unlabelled.
-
Studio shot of a frosted glass serum bottle with a gold dropper cap on a wet slate surface, soft diffused light, pale green botanical shadows
-
white running shoe floating mid air, clean grey background, product photo for a shop listing
-
A can of sparkling lemon water covered in condensation, ice cubes and a lemon slice splashing beside it, bright high-key lighting, crisp commercial look
Show the other 7 requests
-
Premium product photo of matte black wireless earbuds in an open charging case on a dark brushed-metal surface, single soft key light, subtle reflections
-
kraft paper coffee bag with a simple blank label on a wooden counter next to scattered coffee beans, morning light from the side
-
Lifestyle shot of a handmade ceramic bowl of granola with berries and a linen napkin, overhead view, soft natural light, muted earthy tones
-
Macro product photo of a thin gold ring with a small emerald on a white marble block, shallow depth of field, soft shadow, luxury catalogue style
-
mustard velvet armchair, studio catalog shot
-
A scented soy candle in an amber glass jar with a wooden lid, lit, on a stack of folded linen with eucalyptus sprigs, cosy warm ambience, soft focus background
-
Hero banner image for an online outdoor store: a brushed stainless steel water bottle lying on wet rocks beside a mountain stream, early morning mist, pine trees out of focus behind, cool tones, wide composition with empty space on the left for a headline
How this was measured
- Same requests. 10 product photo prompts, written like real users write, sent to 12 models from Picsart's AI Playground.
- Blind judge, twice. An AI judge ranked each request's outputs without model names, then again reshuffled.
- Error bars. Plackett–Luce ratings bootstrapped over requests; CLIP, an aesthetic predictor shown as checks.
Questions people ask
- Which AI model is best for product photos?
- GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst (OpenAI): 21% chance of ranking first on 10 product photos requests, ahead of GPT Image 2 at 21%, out of 12 models tested the same way.
- Is GPT Image 2 as good as GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst for product photos?
- Close: their 95% error bars overlap (GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst +0.32 to +2.12, GPT Image 2 +0.65 to +1.86 log-strength), so on 10 requests GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst is only the more likely winner.
- How was the best model for product photos measured?
- Same 10 requests to every model; a blind AI judge ranked the outputs twice, shuffled (agreement between runs: Kendall tau 0.63, where 1 is an identical order and 0 unrelated); Plackett-Luce ratings with 95% bootstrap error bars, CLIP and aesthetic scores as checks.